Some more of my law knowledge will be kicking in here, since it’s yet one more thing that is not widely understood, and as such, amounts to a HUGE amount of ignorance and consequence:
We may have some sort of illness or condition we are contending with that when we research for more information, find that what ever the label is we have been given (keep in mind, the labels are often…VERY often…either wrong or misleading, a topic for another time) that there is apparently no “cure.”
This depresses the researcher often, and leads them to believe that whatever they are dealing with, is life-long and there is no SOLUTION for it.
This would be an entirely inaccurate assumption, and one that is made SO often, that countless people are suffering needlessly because they have not yet considered that what they thought they understood…they actually did not.
And that there IS a remedy to their problem.
Perhaps not a “CURE”…because that carries a legal nexus.
But there may be a way, perhaps MANY ways, to totally relieve the symptoms that the person is dealing with.
And isn’t that what everyone WANTS first and foremost?
Hence pain killers being such great sellers.
But my point is more along the lines of resolving the actual PROBLEM, as compared to merely masking symptoms. And everyone who follows my path knows this is what I’m all about.
Whenever one reads that there is “no cure,” you MUST keep in mind that this lack of “cure” is only within it’s specific realm of operation. Meaning, the modes that are used and accepted within that field, such as the medical field, have very…VERY…definite limitations. Limitations that forbid the use of certain approaches, and strongly favor other approaches based on relationships and organizational agendas.
No need to go into details on those topics.
All you need to understand is that whenever you see that there is no “cure” for something, I can assure you with near 100% accuracy, that if the report is fully understood from the perspective of the writer, and what limitations exist within the opinion offered, both from a financial and legal standpoint, you would find that instead there are alternatives that exist outside of this sphere that would with high probability enable the reader to find a resolution to their symptoms, and their problem.
Not a “cure.”
But a “resolution.”
Would that be good enough for now?