The vaccine profiles that kids are subjected to these days are multi-fold what I was exposed to when I was a kid growing up in the late 60’s and on. I have heard of just huge huge numbers of shots given out, that go way beyond my ability to understand, as hard as I’ve tried.
I do not have a firm opinion yet on the issue, but I lean strongly against most vaccinations, potentially all of them.
I base this current stance on knowing three families whose children are not vaccinated at all. All of them have healthy children, with some minor issues here and there relating to gluten intolerance and another common gut-related problem in another child, and perhaps an allergy or two with one or two of the children. In all, there are about a dozen or more children (yes, one of the families has a larger-than-average number of kids).
One common part of this controversy does not have anything to do with the actual pathogen component of the vaccine, but rather the mercury preservative used in the vaccine itself. The argument is rather ethyl mercury in Thimerisal is safer than methyl mercury, which is known to be harmful.
I get really pissed off…to be blunt…that this “controversy” is even raised.
The safety is said to related to the idea that ethyl mercury leaves the body about ten times faster than methyl mercury, and is completely safe.
Let’s just present those that administer vaccines with this option:
If it is as safe as is claimed, load a syringe with the same proportion of ethyl mercury as would be found in a vaccination, the rest filled with placebo, and administer those shot amounts (which seem to be in the dozens these days) to the person administering the vaccine.
If there is ANY hesitation about doing this, WHY?
And if so…considering that it’s of course a licensed adult doing the administering…WHY would we then be willing to do the same with a CHILD…while INCLUDING the introduction of a disease into the body?
Just seems like common sense to me.
Is there nothing to the notion of vaccines?
I think they may hold a lot of importance for certain applications.
But what I have a serious problem with, is the medical community…and big pharma…capitalizing on this potentially highly effective means of preventing disease, and *complicating it*…or USING it…as a way to either make more money, or do more harm than good as some people believe, while using the positive perceptions of what vaccines are capable of doing to help perpetuate their objective; what ever that objective may actually be.